Skip to main content

The Competency Myth

I am sure everybody in their life would have had their own wins and losses .One of the most associated term with losses and wins and more precisely in this competitive world is “Competency”. Let’s understand the meaning of the word technically before getting into detail of it .It means the ability to do something successfully or efficiently”. 

Either in professional or personal life in this highly competitive world we always win over the other or lose over the other .When we win it’s claimed we are competent and when we lose we are associated with incompetency. The fact is presence or absence of competency at the end of the day is a judgment based on individual or collective decision based on few or set of parameters. The biggest challenge and debate for me is here.Sometimes we are claimed incompetent or competent because the parameters defined are wrong or the assessment or decision may be wrong. I am not here by making this statement criticising, But there is a fundamental logic based on which I request all of us to evaluate this claim. In a highly dynamic environment I think it’s important to understand that the competency required also keeps changing for a specific role /job/task/activity and the person or the judge if out-dated would not be in a position to identify the right set of parameters or will not be a qualified assessor .

Lets take an example to get more clarity on this. If a particular person has done sales role ten years back and not today this particular person may not be the right assessor to judge the competency required for the current market conditions for the sales role and the solution he /she proposes shall not be the right one for current challenges .Also another example could be if the person has been doing the same set of activities for longer tenure then it doesn’t matter if its two years or ten years’ experience as the activities are the same. Hence the correlation between experience and competency becomes a myth or invalid here too. 

Also most of the times competency is evaluated on the absolute finals and not on the relative finals with respect to the portfolio.In simple terms competency of sitting in a winning horse and sitting on a tortoise should not be evaluated with the same yard stick .Hence it’s very important keeping in mind the motivation aspects of human, defining the right set parameters in the current context and choosing the right set of people as assessors.

If it is not defined properly what happens is either the choice is wrong or we lose the right. I think it’s high time we relook the competency parameters keeping in mind the market dynamism .Else we may only be creating empty vessels with more noise.


Popular posts from this blog

What makes Great Work Places?

It is natural for all of us to dream to get job in great  workplaces, as we spend majority of conscious hours at work.  Great workplaces,  empowers its people. Demonstrates an affection towards organisation and develop a desire to stay with the organisation. What makes great workplaces ? Research  proves, “more money doesn’t make employee happier, nor cosy office premises”.   It is the “ Leaders” , who  play a crucial role in bringing up  great workplaces to work, with the trust and  commitment he demonstrate  among the employees of all ranks. This facilitates employees to develop a trust towards their Leaders and develop a desire to stay with the organisation despite opportunities to work elsewhere. Take an extra effort and engage in behaviours that contribute to business success. This attitude will tend to lead maximum job satisfaction i.e I like my work and I do it well with maximum job contribution ; I help my organisation to achieve the goals. They are ent

Top seven things that leadership candidates should think about!

Ever since the concepts of management got evolved the one phrase which would be undoubtedly accepted is “It’s not the volume but the value that matters” . This phrase becomes more apt in the leadership hiring process as it is purely a value transfer in terms of many parameters which is do with hard competencies ,soft competencies etc. Having been and continuing to be in the recruitment and more precisely in the leadership hiring industry in my experience the following are the seven key parameters which might be unstated but one as a candidate should keep in mind when we go through leadership hiring process. Success is appreciated & equally failure lessons: In my experience I have seen resumes and leadership candidates talking great about their achievements, projects success, driving company results etc. As much as these are really great in a span of close to decades of experience I am sure everyone would have made wrong decisions and seen failures as well. In my exp


Y ou have become a  true mother when you carry your brain child for years and deliver it after 3 years.Thats the feel I got when I refurbished our CBHR on June 16-2018.  It was a cloudy Saturday when we had around 35 registrations the day before . We anticipated 20 HR leaders for the event. However we had commiited 10+ attending the event. Ramzon weekend and rains blessed us to have a small interactive team this time. Members were given New CBHR membership cards. As I always say " Small has nothing to do with Value Offered" . The program started at10 :30 am with opening speech by me on CBHR its Idea and the Vision. Later the floor was opened to brainstorming on path forward. Several ideas got opened up and the agenda for next meeting was also fixed. Then it was a session by me on " Innovation" under the Blue Ocean Framework. Later Mr Vig CPO of Mosaikrisk also presented his project work on " Gamification and PMS". The